---
title: Provider setup
description: Register your own Google, Cal.com, and Calendly apps so your customers connect under your name.
---

Some connections your customers make involve a third party asking them for
permission. By default that permission screen would carry our name. Registering
your own applications with those providers puts **your** name there instead, so
the white label holds all the way through.

This is set up once, in the partner portal, and it covers three providers:
**Google**, **Cal.com**, and **Calendly**.

## Why it matters

Two things change once a provider is configured for your program.

**Your customers see your name.** When someone connects their calendar, the
provider's consent screen names the application asking for access. Without your
own registration, that is not you.

**Google sign-in appears on your domain.** On a partner domain, the *Sign in
with Google* button is only shown when you have configured Google yourself.
Until then your customers sign in with an email address and password only — the
button is hidden rather than broken, so it is easy to miss that it is missing.

## Setting one up

You register an application with the provider, in your own account there, and
then enter what it gives you into the portal's **Integrations** screen. The
portal shows each provider as configured or not configured, so you can see at a
glance what is still outstanding.

The provider will ask where to send people back to after they approve access.
The portal shows you the exact value to use — copy it from there rather than
typing it, since a mismatch is the usual reason a connection fails at the last
step.

Treat the values the provider gives you like passwords. If one may have been
exposed, replace it at the provider and update it in the portal.

## What your customers do afterwards

Nothing changes for them. They connect their calendar the ordinary way, from
their own workspace — see [Integrations](../integrations.md). The only
difference is whose name they see while doing it.

## If you skip it

Your program still works. Customers can still use the product, and connections
that do not involve a consent screen are unaffected. What you lose is the
consistency: the one moment where a customer is handed to a third party is the
moment the branding would otherwise slip.
